Dr Donal Ryan
Chair of Examinations JFICMI
FJFICMI Examination April/May 2022
The SBA/SAQ exams were conducted online on Thursday 28th of April 2022.
Both the SAQ and SBA exams underwent a standard setting process, which produced a pass mark using the Angoff method. The exam pass mark was adjusted to allow a standard deviation below the set mark and that was used as a cut-off value.
The clinical exam (2 long cases in ICU) was conducted in three centres in Dublin:- Beaumont, St James’s and St Vincent’s hospitals on Thursday May 26th.
The viva exams (one focusing on imaging/waveforms and data and one focusing on clinical and organisational ICU topics) were conducted in the college of anaesthesiologists. The examiners involved are listed below.
Of the 20 candidates for the clinical exam, 17 passed the exam overall.
The gold medal was split between three candidates who each scored 27/30 marks.
I wish to acknowledge and thank our dedicated examiners in Beaumont, St James’s and St Vincent’s Hospitals for their support with these exams.
Beaumont Hospital
Ruth-Aoibheann O’Leary (Lead)
Michael Power
Ger Curley
Mairead Hayes
Colman O’Loughlin
Brian Marsh
David Devlin
Bryan Reidy
St James's Hospital
Enda O’Connor (Lead)
Daniel Collins
Liz Connolly
Arabella Fahy
Catherine Motherway
John Bates
Michael Scully
Sean Keane
St Vincent's Hospital
Donal Ryan (Lead)
Andrew Westbrook
Jennifer Hastings
Laura Flood
Caitriona Cody
Sohel Ahmed
Peter Moran
Diarmuid O’Briain
EDIC 11 Examination
9th & 10th November 2022
Dr Andrew Westbrook, Dean JFICMI & Donal Ryan, FJFICMI Examinations Chair
Dublin EDIC Autumn Examination 2022
November 9 and 10, 2022
The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland provided two staff members to help organise and run the exam (Ruth Flaherty and Orla Doran). Without their assistance, the exam would not be possible. A technical support person was also available throughout both days of the exam and they were also useful in dealing with the computer set-up and glitches that arose.
34 candidates presented for the examination (there were 2 cancellations)
Day 1 Wednesday
We had twelve examiners and two newly appointed examiners who observed.
The pre-exam meeting was conducted from 12 noon (Dublin time – CET-1hr). Each examiner was familiar with their own CBS station and the technical requirements of the process before commencement of the exam at 2 pm local time.
The set-up consisted of four groups of three tables arranged around a large ballroom. Each computer had one set of headphones.
The internet/wi-fi was excellent and there were no drop-outs from our end.
There was only one (minor) technical issue. Two candidates had been given the same address to log into their exam ‘room’. This was quickly rectified by Ruth, who sent one of the candidates the correct address and the matter was resolved easily and no time was lost.
Day 2 Thursday
We had a similar day in terms of technical issues – excellent wi-fi and minor glitches that were easily dealt with.
The major problems on the day were
(i) Noise:
The presence of additional examiners in the room meant we could not use the headsets as the second examiner at each table would not be able to hear the candidate. This created a marked increase in ambient noise. The matter was helped in the afternoon by moving three table into an adjoining room.
In future, we will aim to have two set of headphones per table.
(ii) Shortage of examiners
We were unable to get a full compliment of examiners. We had 22/24 confirmed examiners on the day before the exam. Given the two candidate cancellations, we had arranged the timetable to have two examiners at nearly all of the tables. Unfortunately, we had two examiner withdrawals on the day of the exam (due to illness and last-minute work clash). This meant that the CCS 1 station was examined by four of our most experienced examiners on their own. When examiners did not have a candidate to examine, they redistributed to the tables with one examiner to allow two examiners to be present at that time. This was possible on the first and third session.
Given that the solo examiners in question had years of experience, they were able to accommodate the adjustment without any difficulty. Some remarked that they found it easier to examine on their own and were able to stay engaged throughout the day.
Hopefully, we will be able to recruit some additional examiners in the future. The change to 36 candidates from 27 and the two day format impacted on our available examiner pool.
We had over 24 examiners over the two days but not everyone from day 1 could do day 2 and, similarly, some examiners only attended on day 2.
Overall, there was positivity towards the exam process amongst those examiners in attendance and the Dublin centre is keen to continue to provide one sitting of EDIC 2 per year into the future.